Ugandan TikToker Gets 6 Years in Jail for Mocking Museveni

24-year-old Edward Awebwa has been sentenced to six years in prison for posting a video on TikTok that was deemed offensive to President Yoweri Museveni and his family.

The case highlights the ongoing tension between digital activism and government control in the East African nation. Awebwa was found guilty on four counts of hate speech and spreading “misleading and malicious” information against President Museveni, First Lady Janet Museveni, and their son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba who heads the country’s military. The video in question contains insults directed at the first family and claims about potential tax increases under Museveni’s leadership. Presiding over the case, Magistrate Stella Maris Amabilis emphasized the need for Awebwa to learn from his actions.

The sentence of six years for each charge, to be served concurrently, reflects the court’s stance on protecting the dignity of Uganda’s leadership. However, this harsh punishment has raised concerns among human rights advocates and free speech proponents. The case against Awebwa is not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of government crackdowns on digital dissent in Uganda. In recent years, several high-profile cases have highlighted the risks faced by those who criticize the government online. In 2022, acclaimed Ugandan author Kakwenza Rukirabashaija faced similar charges after making critical remarks about the president and his son on Twitter.

Rukirabashaija’s case gained international attention when he fled to Germany, alleging torture during his detention in Uganda. Another prominent case involved Stella Nyanzi, an activist and writer who faced legal repercussions for publishing a poem critical of President Museveni. Nyanzi, who is currently in exile, has become a symbol of resistance against government attempts to stifle free speech. These cases unfold against a backdrop of evolving legal frameworks governing online speech in Uganda. In 2022, President Museveni signed a law aimed at regulating online communication, a move that drew criticism from rights groups who saw it as a tool for suppressing dissent.

However, in a significant development last year, Uganda’s constitutional court ruled that a section of this law penalizing “offensive communication” was unconstitutional. Human rights lawyer Michael Aboneka has described the legal landscape surrounding online speech in Uganda as “vague.” He argues that criticism of leadership is vital for a healthy democracy and questions the government’s approach to dissent, asking whether they intend to arrest every Ugandan who voices opposition. In Africa, many countries are grappling with how to regulate online speech while balancing concerns about misinformation, national security, and political stability.

Critics argue that some governments are using these concerns as a pretext to silence opposition and maintain power. Uganda’s situation is particularly notable given President Museveni’s long tenure in office. Having ruled since 1986, Museveni has faced increasing criticism in recent years, especially from younger Ugandans who have known no other leader. The rise of social media platforms like TikTok has provided new avenues for this younger generation to express their frustrations and challenge the status quo.