A woman who cohabited with a deceased German man for over five years has won a succession case and will receive a share of his multi-million-shilling estate.
This comes after the High Court in Mombasa declared that the woman referred to as TNI in court documents is entitled to a share of the deceased’s (HO) estate despite failing to prove that she was married to him under the Kamba customary law.
In his ruling, Justice John Onyiego declared that TNI was a beneficiary under Section 3(5) of the Law of Succession Act, hence she is entitled to a share of the estate as HO’s wife.
“From the evidence on record, the deceased had indeed cohabited and presented to the general public and right-thinking men and women in society that they were living together as husband and wife,” the judge ruled.
He further determined that HO was polygamous, meaning TNI and the man’s second wife identified with the initials YO will share his estate equally. The estate includes land, household goods, and vehicles worth millions of shillings.
Following HO’s death in 2005, YO petitioned for a grant of representation in the inheritance of his estate, listing herself and his two daughters as the only beneficiaries.
But in 2006, TNI and the man’s first wife (GO) claimed to be HO’s widows and filed an objection, saying YO did not consult them before filing the petition and that she was attempting to disinherit them. They also claimed that YO had received the HO’s pension without accounting for it.
TNI told the court that she met HO in 1999 when he visited Kenya as a tourist, adding that the man confided in her that he had divorced his first wife, GO, in 1976 and married YO in 1985, but they separated in 1999.
She further testified that HO proposed to marry her and that they had visited her rural home in Ukambani, where she introduced him to her family as her intended husband. The two then moved back to Mombasa and started living together as husband and wife, she added.
The court also heard the deceased filed a petition to divorce YO in 2004, but he died before the divorce was finalized.
TNI denied being married to another German national and dismissed a marriage certificate produced as evidence of her marriage to the foreigner as fake.
HO’s daughters recognized YO as the only lawful widow of the deceased, not TNI or their mother.
In his ruling, Justice Onyiego said TNI failed to prove the existence of a marriage between her and HO under Kamba customary law, saying she failed to prove whether any bride price negotiations ever took place or whether any cultural rites or rituals or formalities were performed. She also did not tell the court how much dowry was paid and in whose presence.
Nevertheless, TNI won the case based on the argument that she had cohabited with HO for over five years after he separated from his second wife.
If case law is practiced in…
If case law is practiced in Kenya, this ruling will be a mother lode for some con women. Affluent widows once married to wealthy men might just get that call from a family law attorney on behalf of a disgruntled ex co-habitant.
This is a dangerous…
This is a dangerous precedent.Surely in the eyes of the law,there is a difference between marriage,and merely living together.Marriage is a contract.Living cohabiting is not.In the eyes of the public two people cohabiting may appear for all intends and purposes as a married couple.But that’s just it appearence.We should go by what the law says. As @ mlandizi has eloquently state above, what would stop a former cohabitant to claim some benefits from her former live-in boyfriend,or even a dead one?Especially if they cohabited for more than 5 years.
When you start interpreting the law beyond what the framers of the law intended,you create enormous problems.It gets messy. Just simplify matters.Let sidechicks and cohabitants be aware that they get nothing allowed in the marriage union.They earn their benefits by ” pay as you go”.It’s their choice.
That’s Correct. MiPango…
That’s Correct. MiPango ya?Kando isiPande mbegu tu; iPande☝️Bei pia.
Great ruling, you can’t fack…
Great ruling, you can’t fack the lady for years and then fack her off to the streets!!!
cohabitation= marriage…
cohabitation= marriage.Thanks for the clarification.
Comrades, why are we…
Comrades, why are we fighting about this, they do it in USA, in fact it’s 6 months in Texas, 5 year? she deserves it.