The National Security Advisory Committee (NSAC) has denied claims by IEBC Chairperson Wafula Chebukati that it attempted to interfere with the presidential results.
Chebukati, in an affidavit filed at the Supreme Court responding to the petition challenging president-elect William Ruto’s victory, claimed that the committee demanded moderation of results to favor Azimio La Umoja presidential candidate Raila Odinga.
He alleged that some members of the powerful committee led by Head of Public Service Joseph Kinyua and other senior government officials wanted to subvert the will of the people by asking him to ensure a runoff if he could not declare Odinga as the winner in August 9th presidential election.
Chebukati also listed Principal Administrative Secretary at the office of the President Kennedy Kihara, Solicitor General Kennedy Ogeto, Inspector General of Police Hillary Mutyambai and Vice Chief of Defense Forces General Francis Omondi Ogolla.
In a replying affidavit, Kinyua who chairs the NSAC admitted that officials met the electoral commission but to only address security concerns raised.
‘I categorically deny the second respondent’s insinuation that I arranged a meeting between him and members of the NSAC with a view to influencing the outcome of the presidential election held on August 9, 2022, in favor of a particular candidate,” Kinyua states.
He stated members of the public together with various political parties, party agents and even the candidates themselves were present at meeting with the IEBC at Bomas of Kenya.
“Had the intention of the NSAC been as sinister as sought to be portrayed in the affidavits, the subject of this response, the meeting would not have been requested and held at such an open and public venue with all the commissioners present,” Kinyua adds.
On his part, the Principal Administrative Secretary at the Office of the President Kennedy Kihara says they acted on the instructions of NSAC to meet Chebukati to advise him on security issues.
“The meeting was necessitated by the fact that the NSAC in the discharge of its mandate had become ceased of information to the effect that the delays in declaring the results of the presidential elections and the manner in which results were being transmitted including the stoppage of the public display of results had generated considerable public anxiety and tension and risked creating the opportunity for chaos, violence, and insecurity in parts of the country,” Kihara says in his affidavit.
There are 3 occupations…
There are 3 occupations where lying and conniving are the first steps of the ladder to success; prostitution, drug dealing, and politics. Any questions?
You forgot uDA propaganDA.
You forgot uDA propaganDA.
Chebukati is a thief who got…
Chebukati is a thief who got caught. He belongs in jail.
Guest must be a Moi…
Guest must be a Moi descendant where everything is corrupt and exposing the corrupts is a crime
Corrupt morons
Corrupt morons
WSR #1 on the List,…
WSR #1 on the List,
Chebukati #2, and
UDA #3.
If this is the “brain” of…
If this is the “brain” of our national security council we are doomed. First ,the 0.01% group accuse their chairman of “releasing results before/ ahead of scrutiny – needed more time to count 0.01%!” . Security dudes say the results had taken long- by whose count- no one knows. Second, the anxiety expressed by these liars only existed in their heads since they knew the results already – I assume the “security council did tally the votes as a matter of national security?” and realizing Kenyans had rejected their evil schemes were “anxious”.
More shocking is the logic given by these council and the 0.01% illiterate 4 “that results were not streaming at BOMAS”. Kenyans- in 2017 NASA went to court to stop result “streaming calling it un-constitutional” and went shouting algorithm/ vifaranga via komputa bs. Pray , which one was to cause more anxiety- result streaming showing your god losing in broad daylight and would yell rigging? There was no provision for streaming result- the portal was open if you wanted to count- but security council/Azimio cannot count and are now spewing nonsense about hacking of “system by system?” How has counting paper ballot 34As and collating them in 34Bs become a computer forensic enterprise? By the way , what has the “security council” done to those who caused chaos at bomas? Nothing- because they worked for you and were trying to incite the nation to violence but Kenyans are a GEM- they saw through your coup schemes and exposed you for who you are- undemocratic despots who have no regard to rule of law and our constitution- who had told you Kikuyus and Luos were to fight? Over what and why? Who will fight for an 80yr old grandfather who cannot open his inner eyes and see it is OVER? What a shame that Kenya is lead by these kind of juveniles.
0.01% of about 14,250,000…
0.01% of about 14,250,000 valid Votes is 142,250 votes. These are lots of Votes; as such Every (0.01%) point STOLEN (from RAILA) counted. Eg: 0.02% would amount to 284,500 (close to 300,000 votes). And by the Way: Over 1,500,000 (1.5 Million) were Stolen from RAILA.
Thanks Francis for your…
Thanks Francis for your meticulous and up to the point explanation into these cooked and crooked Azimio charade of individuals wanting to arm twist the outcome of our free and fare elections.
Well they were all drunk and…
Well they were all drunk and wanted to unlock the hangover hence the reason they cannot recall the 3am meeting
Truth be told… they’d hit…
Truth be told… they’d hit theirs chests…from the IT guy to Mdomo Labour guy, to Oburu O …. The truth was n is out there for anyone looking.
Thank you so very kindly…
Thank you so very kindly Francis.
Can you say that all over again loudly.
Does any one of them read here?
No more,no less,Francis said it all