Create:
Author: Mwakilishi

It is slowly being revealed that thousands of forms were not signed by each party’s agents as a hard copy back-up to the electronic transmission and that many forms lacked official stamp and signatures- and that was enough to convince Maraga.

If this is the only holding that convinced the Chief Justice to annul the entire election, then the judge and the whole country was played by the opposition. And here is why, in my opinion.

The agents who didn’t sign - Why didn’t they?

Since their duty was to observe and sign, then they failed in their duty and responsibility. If they couldn’t sign because something was wrong and didn’t therefore sign in protest- Why didn’t they make a note as to why they couldn’t sign. Why didn’t they alert any officials or Western election monitors or call press immediately after the exercise and say why they couldn’t sign.

Those who were supposed to stamp the forms, why didn’t they? The court must not only say that the forms were not signed but, must also through demonstrable evidence adduced during the court proceedings show why those agents never signed or at least what the court interpreted as the compelling and convincing reason why they never signed.

If the court vacates any substantiation as to the intent of the agents that resulted in their dereliction of duty, then it leaves the door open for speculation that the opposition planted those agents, paid them off, bribed them or coerced them into absconding their duties and therefore cause irregularities, abuse of process and illegalities that Maraga would eventually snatch to use in his annulment- And if you find my reasoning crazy, tell me why the agents never signed / stamped the forms.

Even if we accept that thousands of forms were not signed/stamped, was that enough to annual the entire election results and cast the entire nation into a crisis? Please note, thousands not millions.

Under normal court business, the court owes the entire nation a duty not only to mouth a verdict but ultimately to balance the weight and veracity of the evidence adduced in court against the reality of the moment and the country. Court must find that the evidence presented is so compelling, and not minute; such that once applied, the election results could not stand. In a word, did the agents absconding of their duty amount into an overwhelming injustice enough to obliterate Uhuru’s lead of 1.4 million votes.

The question is: Were the agents’ refusal to do their jobs, one and the same as election irregularities- or was it merely an individual deliberately, willingly, and knowingly absconding his /her responsibilities for whatever reason?

Country in Crisis

More than Shillings 10 billion must now be spent on an election re-run. Wanainchi themselves will spend into thousands individually; sparing a day to register to vote, spending a day out voting, commuting expenses to go out to vote- breakfast, lunch not to mention the millions of man hours that will be lost. I submit that billions and billions of Shillings is the cost we must face as a nation because Maraga imagines a perfect election exercise the likes of which even the Western developed nations have never enjoyed. As PLO Lumumba Esq. said “on small things, law has no answer” I am afraid, merely based on

small things we have become a laughing stalk in the rest of the world for using judicial power as a matter of personal taste. In my opinion, the ruling was both reckless and abuse of judicial power. As an old maxim states, “If you break it, you own it”. Maraga should now ready himself; more than one hundred sixteen (116) election petition cases are now in front of the court and all petitioners have one thing in common- ready, able, and willing to drink their cup of Maraga’s form of justice- if you allege and throw tantrums-I appease you and embrace you, regardless of real and actual admissible and demonstrable evidence adduced in court, Notwithstanding.

By Njoroge Njau Njembura | wamwororo@gmail.com

Comments

imkgoogo (not verified)     Wed, 09/06/2017 @ 10:43pm

Sir, it's better to wait for the Judges to offer their explanation. Agents are not IEBC employees and I hope that's not part their argument. Otherwise, loosing candidates would simply ask their agents not to sign forms to get the election nullified.

Musibi (not verified)     Thu, 09/07/2017 @ 05:08am

In reply to by imkgoogo (not verified)

Presiding Officers and Returning Officers are IEBC employees. They are the ones who accepted those incomplete forms, fake forms, and who failed to stamp those forms. Was it by design? We MUST be told the TRUTH.

Hakika (not verified)     Thu, 09/07/2017 @ 06:20am

In reply to by Chiefu (not verified)

Might be partisan but heck! there is a lot weight to behold in this article. This is exactly what Jubilee lawyers should have strongly argued in court and Maraga would have been cornered. Nevertheless his forty days are around the corner once the four "wise" judges make public their final judgement. Everybody will read or listen to it and ask this same question; how the hell did the four judges find a few thousand forms intentionally and without good reason left unsigned and unstamped a justifiable reason to put the entire nation in jeopardy by nullifying a presidential election whose at least 15 million voters validly cast their votes and were properly counted? Maraga, there is nothing as 100% perfection in elections and perhaps you will learn this too late when the country is already burning from your not so Solomonic wisdom!

sokora (not verified)     Thu, 09/07/2017 @ 10:26am

The fake forms were planted by NASA because they knew very well they had lost the election even before August 8. NASA's only hope was to plant fakes and use those fakes as evidence in court. Mind you most if not all the fakes were from NASA strongholds. Is that a coincident?

MLACHAKE (not verified)     Sat, 09/09/2017 @ 12:24am

Your entire attempt at discrediting Judge Maraga and company is utterly preposterous! It's simply based on IF's and it lacks an in depth look at all the factors the judges looked at. It's way too cheap and pedestrian. Do some serious study first before you write an article!

Mwangaza (not verified)     Thu, 09/21/2017 @ 02:34am

Maraga might as well have been working in cohort with NASA and some NASA symparthizers within IEBC. It is a shame about Kenyans judicial integrity-making history for committing wrongs that will cost citizens fundamental enjoyments of rights and freedoms, business loss, and enhancing already public suffering from the filth in the judiciary?

A sad case for Kenya where organs of government like the judiciary cannot be trusted with matters of national interest,security and well being of the citizens. From the top -see registrar of Supreme presenting untruths in the report so as to favour NASA's petition. NASA are often heard speaking of democracy and corruption. But is this what we see in their actions?

Maraga evokes the fear of God among the influences to the decision. One would ask which God? God of wisdom and truth,and impartial? Or the God some of us create and pray to make our desires come true even when it means causing pain to others? Maybe he needs to quit "JUSTICE" for POLITICS if that is what interests him. With the huge pay, he cannot afford to make decisions that cost citizens billions of shillings when the country is balancing limited resources to equip schools and hospitals, pay civil servants, improve road networks, provide water and affordable healthcare, etc.

Chelimo Alex (not verified)     Fri, 10/13/2017 @ 04:41am

Maraga wanted public recognition, creat a difference no other court in Africa has ever done.. he underestimated the after effects. He didnt interprete the word "free and fair". No election can be perfect as maraga imagines.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
2 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.